14-Month Follow-Up After PRASAD

>

Shared with the patient’s written consent. This is one patient’s experience and does not predict another person’s result.

Starting point

The patient had long-standing, childhood-onset bilateral genu valgum. The right-sided deformity had become more pronounced after a lateral meniscectomy. At review, the intermalleolar distance was 12 cm; the valgus alignment remained present.

Treatment and follow-up

In 2025, the patient underwent bilateral joint-preserving treatment using the PRASAD approach: intra-articular leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) with mechanically isolated adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction (tSVF), and intraosseous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) with LP-PRP, followed by rehabilitation.

At the reported 14-month follow-up, the Apley-derived pain grade was 0. The patient walked normally, climbed stairs, and descended them with smooth control. The 12 cm intermalleolar distance was unchanged, so the improvement in pain and function was not accompanied by correction of the valgus alignment.

Patient walking downstairs at 14-month follow-up
Walking down stairs at 14-month follow-up.
Standing lower-limb view at 14-month follow-up; appearance only, not a standardized alignment measurement.
Standing view at follow-up. The photograph shows appearance only and is not a standardized alignment measurement.
Knee flexion during clinical assessment at 14-month follow-up.
Knee flexion during examination at follow-up.

Patient-reported scores

Questionnaire scores for both knees together changed as follows:

Measure Recalled before treatment At follow-up
IKDC 51.7 67.8
KOOS pain 53 86
KOOS symptoms 64 82
KOOS activities of daily living 74 90
KOOS sport/recreation 60 60
KOOS quality of life 50 63

How to interpret these scores: the pretreatment scores were reconstructed from the patient’s recollection at the 30 October 2026 follow-up; they were not recorded prospectively and may be affected by recall bias. The scores describe both knees together. The responses also recorded some residual intermittent symptoms and activity difficulty; the sport/recreation score was unchanged.

This is an individual follow-up after a combined treatment and rehabilitation programme. It cannot identify the effect of any single component or establish cartilage regeneration.